im-framework

TotalClaw 作者 totalclaw

参考、解释和应用 Forrest Landry 的内在形而上学 (IM) 框架。 使用 767 个实体的结构化本体(概念、公理、定理、术语、格言、含义) 直接链接到 mflb.com 上的源文本。当要求解释 IM 概念时使用,应用 框架到情况,追踪推导链,查找源参考,或将想法联系起来 白皮书。触发点:“内在形而上学”、“IM 框架”、模态问题、公理 参考资料、ICT、对称性/连续性伦理、有效选择、正确行动路径或任何 要求在框架内提出索赔。

安装 / 下载方式

TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw install totalclaw:totalclaw~kapslap-im-framework
cURL直接下载,无需登录
curl -fsSL https://skills.taituai.com/api/skills/totalclaw%3Atotalclaw~kapslap-im-framework/file -o kapslap-im-framework.md
## 概述(中文)

参考、解释和应用 Forrest Landry 的内在形而上学 (IM) 框架。
使用 767 个实体的结构化本体(概念、公理、定理、术语、格言、含义)
直接链接到 mflb.com 上的源文本。当要求解释 IM 概念时使用,应用
框架到情况,追踪推导链,查找源参考,或将想法联系起来
白皮书。触发点:“内在形而上学”、“IM 框架”、模态问题、公理
参考资料、ICT、对称性/连续性伦理、有效选择、正确行动路径或任何
要求在框架内提出索赔。

## 原文

# Immanent Metaphysics Framework

Assess what someone is doing with the tools of the IM and provide grounded, sourced responses with direct links to Forrest Landry's whitebook at mflb.com.

## Bundled Reference Files

All in `references/` (relative to this skill):

| File | Contents |
|------|----------|
| `graph.jsonl` | 767 entities: 134 Concepts, 3 Axioms, 11 Theorems, 147 Aphorisms, 4 Implications. Each has `name`, `definition`, `source_section`, `location` (URL). Relations: implies, paired_with, contrasts_with, depends_on, has_modality, illuminates, defined_in. |
| `whitebook-map.jsonl` | 73 entries mapping whitebook structure (chapters, sections, URLs). Entry point: https://mflb.com/8192 |
| `schema.yaml` | Type definitions and relation types for the ontology. |
| `section-anchors.json` | 116K — anchor map linking section IDs to whitebook URLs for precise citation. |
| `im-bible-commentary/` | Meir's book-by-book IM × Scripture commentary. Files: `00-introduction.md`, `01-genesis.md` … through full Old + New Testament. Each book has a `-summary.md` and `-epigraph.md`. Use for synthesis work connecting IM to Christian/Jewish texts. |

**Full source texts (fetch on demand — not bundled):**
- An Immanent Metaphysics (full book, ~45K words): `web_fetch("https://mflb.com/8192")`
- Aphorisms of Effective Choice (~16K words): `web_fetch("https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch5.htm")`
- For specific chapters: use URLs from `whitebook-map.jsonl` and fetch as needed
- When quoting: always fetch the live URL to get exact text (do not reconstruct from memory)

## How to Use

### 1. Search the Ontology

```bash
# Find a concept by name
grep -i '"name": "symmetry"' references/graph.jsonl

# Find all entities mentioning a term
grep -i 'continuity' references/graph.jsonl | head -10

# Find entities with source URLs
python3 -c "
import json
for line in open('references/graph.jsonl'):
    d = json.loads(line)
    if 'entity' in d:
        props = d['entity'].get('properties',{})
        loc = props.get('location','')
        name = props.get('name', props.get('word', props.get('text','')))
        if 'SEARCH_TERM' in name.lower() or 'SEARCH_TERM' in props.get('definition','').lower():
            print(f'{d[\"entity\"][\"type\"]}: {name}')
            if loc: print(f'  URL: {loc}')
            print(f'  Def: {props.get(\"definition\",\"\")[:200]}')
            print()
"

# Find relations for a specific entity
grep '"ENTITY_ID"' references/graph.jsonl | grep relation
```

### 2. Link to Source

Every entity with a `location` property has a direct URL to the relevant whitebook section at mflb.com. Always include these links when citing.

Key chapter URLs:

| Topic | URL |
|-------|-----|
| Modalities | [Ch1](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch1.htm#1_modalities) |
| Axioms | [Ch1](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch1.htm#1_axioms) |
| ICT | [Ch3](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch3.htm#1_ict) |
| Symmetry / Continuity | [Ch3](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch3.htm#1_symmetry) |
| Ethics | [Ch6](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch6.htm) |
| Path of Right Action | [Ch6](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch6.htm#2_path) |
| Basal Motivations | [Ch6](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch6.htm#2_basal) |
| Aesthetics | [Ch7](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch7.htm) |
| Mind | [Ch8](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch8.htm) |
| Evolution | [Ch9](https://mflb.com/dvol/control/pcore/own_books/white_1/wb_web_2/zout/upmp_ch9.htm) |

### 3. Assess and Apply

1. **Identify which modality, axiom, or theorem they're engaging with.** Search the ontology.
2. **Check for modal confusion.** Collapsing omniscient into immanent? Treating transcendent as omniscient? Axiom III (distinct, inseparable, non-interchangeable) is the diagnostic.
3. **Trace derivation chains.** Use `implies`, `depends_on`, `has_modality` relations.
4. **Link to source.** Always provide the mflb.com URL.
5. **Connect to aphorisms.** The 147 aphorisms illuminate practical application.

## Quick Reference

### The Three Modalities

**Immanent** — relational, interactive, participatory. First-person experience. The center of any continuum.

**Omniscient** — structural, external, fixed. Third-person observation. The whole seen at once.

**Transcendent** — possibility, precondition, a priori. No fixed position. True at all locations.

### The Three Axioms

**I:** The immanent is more fundamental than the omniscient and/or the transcendent. The omniscient and transcendent are conjugate.

**II:** A class of the transcendent precedes an instance of the immanent. A class of the immanent precedes an instance of the omniscient. A class of the omniscient precedes an instance of the transcendent.

**III:** The immanent, omniscient, and transcendent are distinct, inseparable, and non-interchangeable.

### The ICT (Incommensuration Theorem)

From six intrinsics of comparison (sameness, difference, content, context, subject, object):

- **Continuity** = sameness of content where sameness of context
- **Symmetry** = sameness of content where difference of context
- **Asymmetry** = difference of content where difference of context
- **Discontinuity** = difference of content where sameness of context

**Result:** Symmetry + Continuity cannot both apply absolutely. Valid conjunctions: (Continuity + Asymmetry) OR (Symmetry + Discontinuity).

**Cross-domain:** Bell's Theorem (physics), Godel's Incompleteness (logic), Causality without Determinism (metaphysics).

### Ethics

**Symmetry Ethics:** When inner being is unchanged, expression should be the same regardless of external circumstances.

**Continuity Ethics:** When inner nature is unchanged, the way of relating should remain the same regardless of what or whom one relates to.

These derive from the valid conjunctions of the ICT applied to action. They cannot both be perfectly realized simultaneously.

### Path of Right Action

It is always possible to choose win-win for all involved, at all levels of being. Win-win choices are mutually self-supporting and form a contiguous path. The degree to which win-win seems impossible is the measure of deviation from the path.

## Entity Types in the Ontology

| Type | Count | Contains |
|------|-------|----------|
| Concept | 134 | Named ideas with definitions, modality assignments, source URLs |
| Axiom | 3 | Foundational axioms with statements and implications |
| Theorem | 11 | ICT, Symmetry Ethics, Continuity Ethics, Identity, Bell's mapping, Godel mapping |
| Aphorism | 147 | From Effective Choice, with themes and illumination links |
| Implication | 4 | Cross-domain applications (physics, logic, ethics, consciousness) |

## Attribution

Always attribute to Forrest Landry's Immanent Metaphysics. Distinguish:
1. **Direct citation** — quote with source URL
2. **Close paraphrase** — summary with source URL
3. **Agent synthesis** — your own application, labeled as such

Do not invent positions or imply endorsement of claims not grounded in source material.

## Quoting Requirements (MANDATORY)

**When referencing any IM concept, axiom, theorem, aphorism, or principle:**

1. **Use exact quotes from the source text at mflb.com/8192.** Do not paraphrase when the original text is available.
2. **Every quote must include the direct URL** to the specific section where it appears.
   - Use the `location` field from