Idea To Post
将分散的想法扩展为有深度的帖子。 Use this skill when users need to "expand ideas," "generate posts," "brainstorm content," "writing assistance," "enrich thoughts," "deepen thinking," or provide scattered ideas that need systematic expression.
安装 / 下载方式
TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw skills install shop:totalclaw:akira82-ai~idea-to-postcURL直接下载，无需登录
curl -fsSL http://localhost:3090/api/skills/totalclaw%3Aakira82-ai~idea-to-post/file -o idea-to-post.mdGit 仓库获取源码
git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills/commit/1c9463db376e16b4782b028812447ffe04ac8624## 概述（中文）
将分散的想法扩展为有深度的帖子。 Use this skill when users need to "expand ideas," "generate posts," "brainstorm content," "writing assistance," "enrich thoughts," "deepen thinking," or provide scattered ideas that need systematic expression.
## 原文
# Idea-to-Post Expansion Skill
## Skill Overview
This skill helps you expand scattered ideas (a sentence, a few words, a vague thought) into **90+ point** social media posts.
**Target Positioning: Quality social media content, not technical documentation**
It works through the following ways:
1. **Framework Internalization** - Use thinking frameworks to design questions, but don't mechanically apply them
2. **Information Search & Integration** - Automatically search for high-quality materials, supplement relevant data and cases
3. **Progressive Deep Questioning** - Multiple-choice to set direction + open questions to enrich content, **7-10 rounds of dialogue** until complete
4. **Iterative Polishing & Optimization** - Reflect and optimize after generation, pursuing 90+ point quality
5. **Multi-Platform Output** - Generate post versions adapted to different platforms
**Expected dialogue rounds: 7-10 rounds**
- 3-4 rounds: Get direction and core viewpoints (technical documentation level)
- 5-7 rounds: Add cases, emotions, uniqueness (social media level)
- 7-10 rounds: Deep mining, repeated polishing (quality social media level)
## Core Mechanism: Progressive Questioning + Framework Internalization
### Three Core Principles
**1. Internalize Frameworks, Don't Expose Them**
Use thinking framework logic to design questions, but don't say "I'm using [Framework Name]":
```
Wrong: "I recommend using the PREP framework. Now for Point: What's your viewpoint?"
Correct: "What's the core viewpoint you want to express?"
Questions have framework thinking, but the dialogue is natural.
```
**2. Combine Multiple Choice + Open Questions**
```
Multiple Choice (AskUserQuestion) Quickly lock direction
Open Questions (direct dialogue) Deeply mine content
Multiple Choice = Skeleton | Open Questions = Flesh and blood
```
**3. Progressive Deepening, Dynamic Adjustment**
Each round of questions is based on the previous answer, naturally transitioning to the next dimension:
```
User: "todo is an underrated command"
↓
Follow-up: What does "underrated" specifically mean? (Concept deepening)
↓
User: "People don't know it's a conversation memory mechanism"
↓
Follow-up: What pain point does it solve? (Value inquiry)
↓
Follow-up: Any specific examples? (Case supplement)
```
---
### Questioning Flow (7-10 Rounds of Dialogue + Multi-Stage Search)
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ User inputs idea │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [Initial Search] Background information │
│ collection │
│ - Identify core concepts │
│ - Multi-angle search queries │
│ - Get background materials │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Rounds 1-2: Direction locking │
│ (mainly multiple choice) │
│ - Goal? Audience? Platform? │
│ - Quickly position article type │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Rounds 3-4: Core deep dive │
│ (open questions) │
│ - What's the core viewpoint? │
│ - What does "underrated" specifically mean? │
│ - What pain point does it solve? │
│ - Why do you think so? │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Rounds 5-6: Real cases │
│ (open questions, required) │
│ - When was the most recent time? │
│ - What feature? What specifically was said? │
│ - How did you feel at that moment? │
│ - Any comparison cases? (with vs without) │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 7: Emotional resonance │
│ (open questions, required) │
│ - Most frustrated/surprised moment? │
│ - Physical reaction? Slap thigh? Long sigh? │
│ - Turning point from "useless" to "amazing"? │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 8: Uniqueness │
│ (open questions) │
│ - Any undiscovered tips? │
│ - Any unique usage methods? │
│ - Any counter-intuitive understanding? │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [Precision Search] Based on user's unique │
│ viewpoints │
│ - Extract unique insights/counter-intuitive │
│ viewpoints │
│ - Reverse search for supporting evidence │
│ - Multi-angle validation │
│ (industry/competitors/data) │
│ - Try different keywords if search fails │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 9: Structure confirmation │
│ (multiple choice) │
│ - Article structure? │
│ - Style preference? │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 10: Final touches │
│ (mixed) │
│ - Core golden sentence? │
│ - Call to action? │
│ - Anything else to add? │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Information completeness assessment │
│ (90+ point standard) │
│ Core viewpoint │
│ Real cases (required) │
│ Emotional resonance (required) │
│ Unique viewpoints (required) │
│ External validation (search results) │
│ → Complete, generate content │
│ → Incomplete, continue questioning │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ First draft generation │
│ (standard Markdown format) │
│ - Integrate all information │
│ - Use heading levels, bold, quote blocks, etc. │
│ - Generate structured content │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Reflection and optimization (optional) │
│ - What's not good enough? │
│ - What needs supplementing? │
│ - Iterate and optimize │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘