agent-governance
Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
安装 / 下载方式
TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw install skilldb:skilldb~agent-governancecURL直接下载,无需登录
curl -fsSL https://skills.taituai.com/api/skills/skilldb%3Askilldb~agent-governance/file -o agent-governance.md# Agent Governance Patterns
Patterns for adding safety, trust, and policy enforcement to AI agent systems.
## Overview
Governance patterns ensure AI agents operate within defined boundaries — controlling which tools they can call, what content they can process, how much they can do, and maintaining accountability through audit trails.
```
User Request → Intent Classification → Policy Check → Tool Execution → Audit Log
↓ ↓ ↓
Threat Detection Allow/Deny Trust Update
```
## When to Use
- **Agents with tool access**: Any agent that calls external tools (APIs, databases, shell commands)
- **Multi-agent systems**: Agents delegating to other agents need trust boundaries
- **Production deployments**: Compliance, audit, and safety requirements
- **Sensitive operations**: Financial transactions, data access, infrastructure management
---
## Pattern 1: Governance Policy
Define what an agent is allowed to do as a composable, serializable policy object.
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import Optional
import re
class PolicyAction(Enum):
ALLOW = "allow"
DENY = "deny"
REVIEW = "review" # flag for human review
@dataclass
class GovernancePolicy:
"""Declarative policy controlling agent behavior."""
name: str
allowed_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # allowlist
blocked_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # blocklist
blocked_patterns: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # content filters
max_calls_per_request: int = 100 # rate limit
require_human_approval: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # tools needing approval
def check_tool(self, tool_name: str) -> PolicyAction:
"""Check if a tool is allowed by this policy."""
if tool_name in self.blocked_tools:
return PolicyAction.DENY
if tool_name in self.require_human_approval:
return PolicyAction.REVIEW
if self.allowed_tools and tool_name not in self.allowed_tools:
return PolicyAction.DENY
return PolicyAction.ALLOW
def check_content(self, content: str) -> Optional[str]:
"""Check content against blocked patterns. Returns matched pattern or None."""
for pattern in self.blocked_patterns:
if re.search(pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE):
return pattern
return None
```
### Policy Composition
Combine multiple policies (e.g., org-wide + team + agent-specific):
```python
def compose_policies(*policies: GovernancePolicy) -> GovernancePolicy:
"""Merge policies with most-restrictive-wins semantics."""
combined = GovernancePolicy(name="composed")
for policy in policies:
combined.blocked_tools.extend(policy.blocked_tools)
combined.blocked_patterns.extend(policy.blocked_patterns)
combined.require_human_approval.extend(policy.require_human_approval)
combined.max_calls_per_request = min(
combined.max_calls_per_request,
policy.max_calls_per_request
)
if policy.allowed_tools:
if combined.allowed_tools:
combined.allowed_tools = [
t for t in combined.allowed_tools if t in policy.allowed_tools
]
else:
combined.allowed_tools = list(policy.allowed_tools)
return combined
# Usage: layer policies from broad to specific
org_policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="org-wide",
blocked_tools=["shell_exec", "delete_database"],
blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\s*[:=]"],
max_calls_per_request=50
)
team_policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="data-team",
allowed_tools=["query_db", "read_file", "write_report"],
require_human_approval=["write_report"]
)
agent_policy = compose_policies(org_policy, team_policy)
```
### Policy as YAML
Store policies as configuration, not code:
```yaml
# governance-policy.yaml
name: production-agent
allowed_tools:
- search_documents
- query_database
- send_email
blocked_tools:
- shell_exec
- delete_record
blocked_patterns:
- "(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\\s*[:=]"
- "(?i)(drop|truncate|delete from)\\s+\\w+"
max_calls_per_request: 25
require_human_approval:
- send_email
```
```python
import yaml
def load_policy(path: str) -> GovernancePolicy:
with open(path) as f:
data = yaml.safe_load(f)
return GovernancePolicy(**data)
```
---
## Pattern 2: Semantic Intent Classification
Detect dangerous intent in prompts before they reach the agent, using pattern-based signals.
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass
class IntentSignal:
category: str # e.g., "data_exfiltration", "privilege_escalation"
confidence: float # 0.0 to 1.0
evidence: str # what triggered the detection
# Weighted signal patterns for threat detection
THREAT_SIGNALS = [
# Data exfiltration
(r"(?i)send\s+(all|every|entire)\s+\w+\s+to\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.8),
(r"(?i)export\s+.*\s+to\s+(external|outside|third.?party)", "data_exfiltration", 0.9),
(r"(?i)curl\s+.*\s+-d\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.7),
# Privilege escalation
(r"(?i)(sudo|as\s+root|admin\s+access)", "privilege_escalation", 0.8),
(r"(?i)chmod\s+777", "privilege_escalation", 0.9),
# System modification
(r"(?i)(rm\s+-rf|del\s+/[sq]|format\s+c:)", "system_destruction", 0.95),
(r"(?i)(drop\s+database|truncate\s+table)", "system_destruction", 0.9),
# Prompt injection
(r"(?i)ignore\s+(previous|above|all)\s+(instructions?|rules?)", "prompt_injection", 0.9),
(r"(?i)you\s+are\s+now\s+(a|an)\s+", "prompt_injection", 0.7),
]
def classify_intent(content: str) -> list[IntentSignal]:
"""Classify content for threat signals."""
signals = []
for pattern, category, weight in THREAT_SIGNALS:
match = re.search(pattern, content)
if match:
signals.append(IntentSignal(
category=category,
confidence=weight,
evidence=match.group()
))
return signals
def is_safe(content: str, threshold: float = 0.7) -> bool:
"""Quick check: is the content safe above the given threshold?"""
signals = classify_intent(content)
return not any(s.confidence >= threshold for s in signals)
```
**Key insight**: Intent classification happens *before* tool execution, acting as a pre-flight safety check. This is fundamentally different from output guardrails which only check *after* generation.
---
## Pattern 3: Tool-Level Governance Decorator
Wrap individual tool functions with governance checks:
```python
import functools
import time
from collections import defaultdict
_call_counters: dict[str, int] = defaultdict(int)
def govern(policy: GovernancePolicy, audit_trail=None):
"""Decorator that enforces governance policy on a tool function."""
def decorator(func):
@functools.wraps(func)
async def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
tool_name = func.__name__
# 1. Check tool allowlist/blocklist
action = policy.check_tool(tool_name)
if action == PolicyAction.DENY:
raise PermissionError(f"Policy '{policy.name}' blocks tool '{tool_name}'")
if action == PolicyAction.REVIEW:
raise PermissionError(f"Tool '{tool_name}' requires human approval")
# 2. Check rate limit
_call_counters[policy.name] += 1
if _call_counters[policy.name] > policy.max_calls_per_request:
raise PermissionError(f"Rate limit exceeded: {policy.max_calls_per_request} calls")
# 3. Check content in arguments
for arg in list(args) + list(kwargs.values()):
if isinstance(arg, str):
matched = policy.check_content(arg)