Senior Prompt Engineer
This skill should be used when the user asks to "optimize prompts", "design prompt templates", "evaluate LLM outputs", "build agentic systems", "implement RAG", "create few-shot examples", "analyze token usage", or "design AI workflows". Use for prompt engineering patterns, LLM evaluation frameworks, agent architectures, and structured output design.
安装 / 下载方式
TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw install skilldb:alirezarezvani~senior-prompt-engineercURL直接下载,无需登录
curl -fsSL https://skills.taituai.com/api/skills/skilldb%3Aalirezarezvani~senior-prompt-engineer/file -o senior-prompt-engineer.mdGit 仓库获取源码
git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills/commit/6ea2eca4a6c0a955234b3337dcc67bdaef6db192# Senior Prompt Engineer
Prompt engineering patterns, LLM evaluation frameworks, and agentic system design.
## Table of Contents
- [Quick Start](#quick-start)
- [Tools Overview](#tools-overview)
- [Prompt Optimizer](#1-prompt-optimizer)
- [RAG Evaluator](#2-rag-evaluator)
- [Agent Orchestrator](#3-agent-orchestrator)
- [Prompt Engineering Workflows](#prompt-engineering-workflows)
- [Prompt Optimization Workflow](#prompt-optimization-workflow)
- [Few-Shot Example Design](#few-shot-example-design-workflow)
- [Structured Output Design](#structured-output-design-workflow)
- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
- [Common Patterns Quick Reference](#common-patterns-quick-reference)
---
## Quick Start
```bash
# Analyze and optimize a prompt file
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py prompts/my_prompt.txt --analyze
# Evaluate RAG retrieval quality
python scripts/rag_evaluator.py --contexts contexts.json --questions questions.json
# Visualize agent workflow from definition
python scripts/agent_orchestrator.py agent_config.yaml --visualize
```
---
## Tools Overview
### 1. Prompt Optimizer
Analyzes prompts for token efficiency, clarity, and structure. Generates optimized versions.
**Input:** Prompt text file or string
**Output:** Analysis report with optimization suggestions
**Usage:**
```bash
# Analyze a prompt file
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py prompt.txt --analyze
# Output:
# Token count: 847
# Estimated cost: $0.0025 (GPT-4)
# Clarity score: 72/100
# Issues found:
# - Ambiguous instruction at line 3
# - Missing output format specification
# - Redundant context (lines 12-15 repeat lines 5-8)
# Suggestions:
# 1. Add explicit output format: "Respond in JSON with keys: ..."
# 2. Remove redundant context to save 89 tokens
# 3. Clarify "analyze" -> "list the top 3 issues with severity ratings"
# Generate optimized version
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py prompt.txt --optimize --output optimized.txt
# Count tokens for cost estimation
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py prompt.txt --tokens --model gpt-4
# Extract and manage few-shot examples
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py prompt.txt --extract-examples --output examples.json
```
---
### 2. RAG Evaluator
Evaluates Retrieval-Augmented Generation quality by measuring context relevance and answer faithfulness.
**Input:** Retrieved contexts (JSON) and questions/answers
**Output:** Evaluation metrics and quality report
**Usage:**
```bash
# Evaluate retrieval quality
python scripts/rag_evaluator.py --contexts retrieved.json --questions eval_set.json
# Output:
# === RAG Evaluation Report ===
# Questions evaluated: 50
#
# Retrieval Metrics:
# Context Relevance: 0.78 (target: >0.80)
# Retrieval Precision@5: 0.72
# Coverage: 0.85
#
# Generation Metrics:
# Answer Faithfulness: 0.91
# Groundedness: 0.88
#
# Issues Found:
# - 8 questions had no relevant context in top-5
# - 3 answers contained information not in context
#
# Recommendations:
# 1. Improve chunking strategy for technical documents
# 2. Add metadata filtering for date-sensitive queries
# Evaluate with custom metrics
python scripts/rag_evaluator.py --contexts retrieved.json --questions eval_set.json \
--metrics relevance,faithfulness,coverage
# Export detailed results
python scripts/rag_evaluator.py --contexts retrieved.json --questions eval_set.json \
--output report.json --verbose
```
---
### 3. Agent Orchestrator
Parses agent definitions and visualizes execution flows. Validates tool configurations.
**Input:** Agent configuration (YAML/JSON)
**Output:** Workflow visualization, validation report
**Usage:**
```bash
# Validate agent configuration
python scripts/agent_orchestrator.py agent.yaml --validate
# Output:
# === Agent Validation Report ===
# Agent: research_assistant
# Pattern: ReAct
#
# Tools (4 registered):
# [OK] web_search - API key configured
# [OK] calculator - No config needed
# [WARN] file_reader - Missing allowed_paths
# [OK] summarizer - Prompt template valid
#
# Flow Analysis:
# Max depth: 5 iterations
# Estimated tokens/run: 2,400-4,800
# Potential infinite loop: No
#
# Recommendations:
# 1. Add allowed_paths to file_reader for security
# 2. Consider adding early exit condition for simple queries
# Visualize agent workflow (ASCII)
python scripts/agent_orchestrator.py agent.yaml --visualize
# Output:
# ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
# │ research_assistant │
# │ (ReAct Pattern) │
# └─────────────────┬───────────────────────┘
# │
# ┌────────▼────────┐
# │ User Query │
# └────────┬────────┘
# │
# ┌────────▼────────┐
# │ Think │◄──────┐
# └────────┬────────┘ │
# │ │
# ┌────────▼────────┐ │
# │ Select Tool │ │
# └────────┬────────┘ │
# │ │
# ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐ │
# ▼ ▼ ▼ │
# [web_search] [calculator] [file_reader]
# │ │ │ │
# └─────────────┼─────────────┘ │
# │ │
# ┌────────▼────────┐ │
# │ Observe │───────┘
# └────────┬────────┘
# │
# ┌────────▼────────┐
# │ Final Answer │
# └─────────────────┘
# Export workflow as Mermaid diagram
python scripts/agent_orchestrator.py agent.yaml --visualize --format mermaid
```
---
## Prompt Engineering Workflows
### Prompt Optimization Workflow
Use when improving an existing prompt's performance or reducing token costs.
**Step 1: Baseline current prompt**
```bash
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py current_prompt.txt --analyze --output baseline.json
```
**Step 2: Identify issues**
Review the analysis report for:
- Token waste (redundant instructions, verbose examples)
- Ambiguous instructions (unclear output format, vague verbs)
- Missing constraints (no length limits, no format specification)
**Step 3: Apply optimization patterns**
| Issue | Pattern to Apply |
|-------|------------------|
| Ambiguous output | Add explicit format specification |
| Too verbose | Extract to few-shot examples |
| Inconsistent results | Add role/persona framing |
| Missing edge cases | Add constraint boundaries |
**Step 4: Generate optimized version**
```bash
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py current_prompt.txt --optimize --output optimized.txt
```
**Step 5: Compare results**
```bash
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py optimized.txt --analyze --compare baseline.json
# Shows: token reduction, clarity improvement, issues resolved
```
**Step 6: Validate with test cases**
Run both prompts against your evaluation set and compare outputs.
---
### Few-Shot Example Design Workflow
Use when creating examples for in-context learning.
**Step 1: Define the task clearly**
```
Task: Extract product entities from customer reviews
Input: Review text
Output: JSON with {product_name, sentiment, features_mentioned}
```
**Step 2: Select diverse examples (3-5 recommended)**
| Example Type | Purpose |
|--------------|---------|
| Simple case | Shows basic pattern |
| Edge case | Handles ambiguity |
| Complex case | Multiple entities |
| Negative case | What NOT to extract |
**Step 3: Format consistently**
```
Example 1:
Input: "Love my new iPhone 15, the camera is amazing!"
Output: {"product_name": "iPhone 15", "sentiment": "positive", "features_mentioned": ["camera"]}
Example 2:
Input: "The laptop was okay but battery life is terrible."
Output: {"product_name": "laptop", "sentiment": "mixed", "features_mentioned": ["battery life"]}
```
**Step 4: Validate example quality**
```bash
python scripts/prompt_optimizer.py prompt_with_examples.txt --validate-examples
# Checks: consistency, coverage, format alignment
```
**Step 5: Test with held-out cases