evaluating-llms-harness
lm-eval-harness: benchmark LLMs (MMLU, GSM8K, etc.).
安装 / 下载方式
TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw install hermes:hermes~lm-evaluation-harnesscURL直接下载,无需登录
curl -fsSL https://skills.taituai.com/api/skills/hermes%3Ahermes~lm-evaluation-harness/file -o lm-evaluation-harness.md# lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking
## What's inside
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
## Quick start
lm-evaluation-harness evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks using standardized prompts and metrics.
**Installation**:
```bash
pip install lm-eval
```
**Evaluate any HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size 8
```
**View available tasks**:
```bash
lm_eval --tasks list
```
## Common workflows
### Workflow 1: Standard benchmark evaluation
Evaluate model on core benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval).
Copy this checklist:
```
Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze results
```
**Step 1: Choose benchmark suite**
**Core reasoning benchmarks**:
- **MMLU** (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) - 57 subjects, multiple choice
- **GSM8K** - Grade school math word problems
- **HellaSwag** - Common sense reasoning
- **TruthfulQA** - Truthfulness and factuality
- **ARC** (AI2 Reasoning Challenge) - Science questions
**Code benchmarks**:
- **HumanEval** - Python code generation (164 problems)
- **MBPP** (Mostly Basic Python Problems) - Python coding
**Standard suite** (recommended for model releases):
```bash
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge
```
**Step 2: Configure model**
**HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,dtype=bfloat16 \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0 \
--batch_size auto # Auto-detect optimal batch size
```
**Quantized model (4-bit/8-bit)**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,load_in_4bit=True \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0
```
**Custom checkpoint**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=/path/to/my-model,tokenizer=/path/to/tokenizer \
--tasks mmlu \
--device cuda:0
```
**Step 3: Run evaluation**
```bash
# Full MMLU evaluation (57 subjects)
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu \
--num_fewshot 5 \ # 5-shot evaluation (standard)
--batch_size 8 \
--output_path results/ \
--log_samples # Save individual predictions
# Multiple benchmarks at once
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge \
--num_fewshot 5 \
--batch_size 8 \
--output_path results/llama2-7b-eval.json
```
**Step 4: Analyze results**
Results saved to `results/llama2-7b-eval.json`:
```json
{
"results": {
"mmlu": {
"acc": 0.459,
"acc_stderr": 0.004
},
"gsm8k": {
"exact_match": 0.142,
"exact_match_stderr": 0.006
},
"hellaswag": {
"acc_norm": 0.765,
"acc_norm_stderr": 0.004
}
},
"config": {
"model": "hf",
"model_args": "pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
"num_fewshot": 5
}
}
```
### Workflow 2: Track training progress
Evaluate checkpoints during training.
```
Training Progress Tracking:
- [ ] Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation
- [ ] Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks
- [ ] Step 3: Automate evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Plot learning curves
```
**Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation**
Evaluate every N training steps:
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_checkpoint.sh
CHECKPOINT_DIR=$1
STEP=$2
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=$CHECKPOINT_DIR/checkpoint-$STEP \
--tasks gsm8k,hellaswag \
--num_fewshot 0 \ # 0-shot for speed
--batch_size 16 \
--output_path results/step-$STEP.json
```
**Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks**
Fast benchmarks for frequent evaluation:
- **HellaSwag**: ~10 minutes on 1 GPU
- **GSM8K**: ~5 minutes
- **PIQA**: ~2 minutes
Avoid for frequent eval (too slow):
- **MMLU**: ~2 hours (57 subjects)
- **HumanEval**: Requires code execution
**Step 3: Automate evaluation**
Integrate with training script:
```python
# In training loop
if step % eval_interval == 0:
model.save_pretrained(f"checkpoints/step-{step}")
# Run evaluation
os.system(f"./eval_checkpoint.sh checkpoints step-{step}")
```
Or use PyTorch Lightning callbacks:
```python
from pytorch_lightning import Callback
class EvalHarnessCallback(Callback):
def on_validation_epoch_end(self, trainer, pl_module):
step = trainer.global_step
checkpoint_path = f"checkpoints/step-{step}"
# Save checkpoint
trainer.save_checkpoint(checkpoint_path)
# Run lm-eval
os.system(f"lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained={checkpoint_path} ...")
```
**Step 4: Plot learning curves**
```python
import json
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Load all results
steps = []
mmlu_scores = []
for file in sorted(glob.glob("results/step-*.json")):
with open(file) as f:
data = json.load(f)
step = int(file.split("-")[1].split(".")[0])
steps.append(step)
mmlu_scores.append(data["results"]["mmlu"]["acc"])
# Plot
plt.plot(steps, mmlu_scores)
plt.xlabel("Training Step")
plt.ylabel("MMLU Accuracy")
plt.title("Training Progress")
plt.savefig("training_curve.png")
```
### Workflow 3: Compare multiple models
Benchmark suite for model comparison.
```
Model Comparison:
- [ ] Step 1: Define model list
- [ ] Step 2: Run evaluations
- [ ] Step 3: Generate comparison table
```
**Step 1: Define model list**
```bash
# models.txt
meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf
meta-llama/Llama-2-13b-hf
mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1
microsoft/phi-2
```
**Step 2: Run evaluations**
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_all_models.sh
TASKS="mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa"
while read model; do
echo "Evaluating $model"
# Extract model name for output file
model_name=$(echo $model | sed 's/\//-/g')
lm_eval --model hf \
--model_args pretrained=$model,dtype=bfloat16 \
--tasks $TASKS \
--num_fewshot 5 \
--batch_size auto \
--output_path results/$model_name.json
done < models.txt
```
**Step 3: Generate comparison table**
```python
import json
import pandas as pd
models = [
"meta-llama-Llama-2-7b-hf",
"meta-llama-Llama-2-13b-hf",
"mistralai-Mistral-7B-v0.1",
"microsoft-phi-2"
]
tasks = ["mmlu", "gsm8k", "hellaswag", "truthfulqa"]
results = []
for model in models:
with open(f"results/{model}.json") as f:
data = json.load(f)
row = {"Model": model.replace("-", "/")}
for task in tasks:
# Get primary metric for each task
metrics = data["results"][task]
if "acc" in metrics:
row[task.upper()] = f"{metrics['acc']:.3f}"
elif "exact_match" in metrics:
row[task.upper()] = f"{metrics['exact_match']:.3f}"
results.append(row)
df = pd.DataFrame(results)
print(df.to_markdown(index=False))
```
Output:
```
| Model | MMLU | GSM8K | HELLASWAG | TRUTHFULQA |
|------------------------|-------|-------|-----------|------------|
| meta-llama/Llama-2-7b | 0.459 | 0.142 | 0.765 | 0.391 |
| meta-llama/Llama-2-13b | 0.549 | 0.287 | 0.801 | 0.430 |
| mistralai/Mistral-7B | 0.626 | 0.395 | 0.812 | 0.428 |
| microsoft/phi-2 | 0.560 | 0.613 | 0.682 | 0.447 |
```
### Workflow 4: Evaluate with vLLM (faster inference)
Use vLLM backend for 5-10x faster evaluation.
```
vLLM Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Install vLLM
- [ ] Step 2: Configure vLLM backend
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
```
**Step 1: Install vLLM**
```bash
pip install vllm
```
**Step 2: Configure vLLM backend**
```bash
lm_eval --model vllm \
--model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,tensor_p