clawhub-pr-maintainer
Use when reviewing, triaging, validating, or discussing ClawHub GitHub issues or pull requests, including author context, CI, UI proof, evidence, labels, close decisions, and maintainer handoff.
安装 / 下载方式
TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw install github:openclaw~clawhub~clawhub-pr-maintainercURL直接下载,无需登录
curl -fsSL https://skills.taituai.com/api/skills/github%3Aopenclaw~clawhub~clawhub-pr-maintainer/file -o clawhub-pr-maintainer.md# ClawHub PR Maintainer
Use this skill for maintainer-facing ClawHub GitHub workflow, not for ordinary
implementation work.
## Start With Live GitHub State
- Use `gh pr view` or `gh issue view` against `openclaw/clawhub`; verify live
state before commenting, labeling, closing, or recommending merge.
- For PRs, read title, body, author, labels, comments, files, commits, status
checks, review state, and linked issues.
- Surface author identity briefly: GitHub name/login and account age when
useful. Treat identity as triage signal, never as proof by itself.
Common read-only commands:
```sh
gh pr view <number> --repo openclaw/clawhub --json title,body,author,labels,comments,files,commits,statusCheckRollup,reviewDecision,url
gh issue view <number> --repo openclaw/clawhub --json title,body,author,labels,comments,state,url
gh api users/<login> --jq '{login,name,created_at,type}'
```
## Review Evidence Bar
- For bug fixes, require symptom evidence, a plausible root cause in the touched
code path, and either a regression test or focused manual proof.
- For UI changes, require screenshots or video when the behavior is meaningfully
visual. Use tests as supplemental evidence, not a substitute for visible proof.
- Do not merge or recommend merge based only on PR prose, AI rationale, or green
CI when the changed behavior has not been exercised.
- For contributor-provided screenshots/videos/logs, inspect the artifact
directly and state what it proves. Do not rerun `proof:ui` just to inspect
existing evidence.
## Decide UI Proof Mode
Use the `clawhub-ui-proof` skill when the maintainer/agent should generate new
visual evidence.
- `before-after`: bug fixes, regressions, changed copy, changed layout, or any
PR where main-vs-candidate comparison clarifies the change.
- `feature`: new page, new flow, new UI state, or behavior that cannot exist on
`origin/main`.
- No generated proof: docs-only, backend-only, tests-only, metadata-only, or
already-sufficient contributor evidence.
Write a temporary Playwright scenario under `.artifacts/proof-scenarios/`; do
not infer manual clicks. Keep screenshots and videos in `.artifacts/` until
publishing. Never commit proof artifacts.
## Final Review Comment With Proof
If this review generated `proof:ui` artifacts, publish them before the final PR
review comment. Do not leave only local `.artifacts/...` paths in a PR comment;
they are useful to the maintainer locally but invisible to GitHub readers.
Use:
```sh
bun run proof:publish -- --proof-dir .artifacts/clawhub-ui-proof/<timestamp> --target-pr <number>
```
`proof:publish` copies the selected files to the `qa-artifacts` branch and
upserts a marker-backed PR comment with a **ClawHub UI Proof** section.
That comment includes:
- the proof mode (`before-after` or `feature`)
- the `report.md` result summary
- the most relevant per-step screenshots
- inline video previews when GIF previews are present
- links to full-run MP4s
- links to raw proof files on the artifact branch
Use `--dry-run` before publishing if you need to inspect the generated comment.
If publishing fails because credentials are missing, report the local proof
directory and the failed command instead of posting a comment that claims
evidence is attached.
## ClawSweeper
ClawSweeper is the bot control plane for automated PR/issue review once ClawHub
dispatch is configured. Until then, use this skill for manual maintainer review.
If ClawSweeper has posted a review, read it as evidence but verify live PR state
before acting.
## Commenting And Labels
- Use literal multiline comment bodies or `--body-file`; never pass escaped
`\n` strings.
- Keep maintainer comments short: finding, evidence, requested action, and
verification path.
- When no proof artifacts were generated, `gh pr comment --body-file` is fine.
When proof artifacts were generated, use `proof:publish` so screenshots/videos
are published before posting.
- Do not close more than five issues/PRs in one action without explicit
confirmation and the exact target list.