romantic-relationship-maintenance
Practical relationship maintenance for couples. Use when a relationship feels stale, tense, or on autopilot, when communication has broken down, or when someone wants to strengthen a partnership before it's in crisis.
安装 / 下载方式
TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw install github:LeoYeAI~openclaw-master-skills~romantic-relationship-maintenancecURL直接下载,无需登录
curl -fsSL https://skills.taituai.com/api/skills/github%3ALeoYeAI~openclaw-master-skills~romantic-relationship-maintenance/file -o romantic-relationship-maintenance.md# Romantic Relationship Maintenance This is not dating advice. This is not a replacement for couples therapy. This is for people who are in a relationship that has gone on autopilot — where you're more like roommates than partners, where fights recycle the same arguments, where bids for connection get missed because you're both exhausted. The Gottman Institute has studied over 3,000 couples across 40+ years and can predict divorce with 93% accuracy based on observable patterns. The good news: those patterns are learnable and fixable. The research has been distilled into specific, weekly practices that work even when both of you are tired, busy, and running on fumes. This skill references and extends: difficult-conversations, boundaries-saying-no. ```agent-adaptation # Localization note — relationship norms, therapy access, and legal structures vary by culture. - Therapy access: US: Insurance-dependent. Open Path Collective ($30-80/session) for low-cost. UK: NHS couples counseling (long waitlists). Relate (relate.org.uk) — sliding scale. AU: Medicare rebates through GP mental health plan. Relationships Australia. CA: Some coverage through EAP. Many provinces have community counseling. - Cultural norms: In cultures where divorce carries heavy stigma, frame this skill as strengthening a partnership, not "fixing" it. Avoid implying the relationship is broken. In cultures with extended family involvement, adjust boundaries advice — some couples need to navigate in-laws as a core relationship issue. - Legal frameworks: Marriage, common-law, and civil partnership rights differ by jurisdiction. When discussing separation, reference local legal aid services. - Language note: This skill uses "partner" throughout. Works for married couples, long-term partners, and any committed romantic relationship regardless of gender or legal status. ``` ## Sources & Verification - **The Gottman Institute** -- 40+ years of couples research. The 5:1 ratio, Four Horsemen, and bids for connection are all from this body of work. https://www.gottman.com - **John Gottman, "The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work"** -- The most evidence-based popular book on romantic relationships. Penguin, 2015 (revised edition). - **Sue Johnson, "Hold Me Tight"** -- Attachment theory applied to adult romantic relationships. Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) framework. Little, Brown, 2008. - **Esther Perel, "Mating in Captivity"** -- Research and clinical work on maintaining desire in long-term relationships. Harper, 2007. - **Journal of Marriage and Family** -- Peer-reviewed research on relationship satisfaction, communication patterns, and predictors of relationship stability. ## When to Use - Relationship feels stale, routine, or like "just roommates" - Communication has broken down — every conversation turns into a fight or a silence - One or both partners feel disconnected, unappreciated, or lonely in the relationship - Fights keep recycling the same issues with no resolution - User wants to strengthen a good relationship proactively - Physical intimacy has declined and both people feel it - Major life transition is straining the relationship (new baby, job loss, move, illness) - User is wondering if the relationship is worth saving ## Instructions ### Step 1: Understand What Kills Relationships **Agent action**: Present the Gottman research on relationship predictors. Direct, no sugarcoating. The Gottman Institute filmed thousands of couples having conversations and tracked who stayed together and who didn't. The findings are specific and actionable. ``` THE 5:1 RATIO — THE FUNDAMENTAL NUMBER Stable couples have 5 positive interactions for every 1 negative interaction. Not 50:1. Not zero conflict. Five to one. Positive interactions: laughing together, showing interest, expressing affection, agreeing, showing empathy, apologizing, expressing appreciation. Negative interactions: criticism, defensiveness, contempt, stonewalling, dismissing, eye-rolling, interrupting. If your ratio is below 5:1, the relationship is deteriorating even if you're not actively fighting. Neutral isn't enough. You need active positivity. HOW TO CHECK YOUR RATIO (honest self-assessment): Think about the last week. Count the positive moments (a compliment, a shared laugh, a moment of genuine connection). Count the negative (a criticism, a dismissal, an eye-roll, a shutdown). What's the ratio? Most struggling couples are at 1:1 or lower. They don't need fewer fights. They need more positive deposits. ``` ### Step 2: Identify the Four Horsemen **Agent action**: Help the user identify which destructive patterns are present in their relationship. ``` THE FOUR HORSEMEN — WHAT PREDICTS RELATIONSHIP FAILURE 1. CRITICISM (attacking character, not behavior) Sounds like: "You never help around the house. You're so lazy." vs. Complaint (healthy): "I'm frustrated that the dishes aren't done. Can we figure out a system?" DIFFERENCE: Criticism says "you ARE the problem." Complaint says "here IS a problem." 2. CONTEMPT (disrespect, superiority, disgust) Sounds like: eye-rolling, sarcasm, mockery, name-calling, sneering. "Oh, you think YOU'RE stressed? That's cute." THIS IS THE #1 PREDICTOR OF DIVORCE. Contempt says "I'm better than you." It's corrosive. If contempt is the dominant tone in your relationship, this is a red flag that needs professional help. 3. DEFENSIVENESS (deflecting responsibility) Sounds like: "That's not my fault." "Well, you did [worse thing]." "I only did that because YOU..." Defensiveness is understandable but kills conversations. It says "the problem is you, not me." Nothing gets resolved. 4. STONEWALLING (shutting down, withdrawing, refusing to engage) Sounds like: silence. Walking away. "Whatever." One-word answers. Refusing to make eye contact. Usually happens when someone is physiologically flooded — heart rate above 100 BPM, adrenaline up. They can't process anymore. ANTIDOTES: Criticism --> Use "I" statements. "I feel X when Y happens." Contempt --> Build a culture of appreciation. Express respect daily. Defensiveness --> Take responsibility for even a small part. "You're right that I forgot. I should have set a reminder." Stonewalling --> Take a break. "I need 20 minutes to calm down. I'll come back and we'll continue." Then actually come back. ``` ### Step 3: Learn to Catch Bids for Connection **Agent action**: Explain bids for connection — the #1 predictor — and how to respond. ``` BIDS FOR CONNECTION — THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT CONCEPT A "bid" is any attempt by one partner to connect with the other. Most bids are tiny and easy to miss: "Look at that bird." "How was your day?" "Listen to this song." "I had the weirdest dream." *touching your arm as they walk by* *sending you a meme* *sighing loudly* THREE POSSIBLE RESPONSES: 1. TURNING TOWARD (engaging): "Oh cool, what kind?" / "Tell me." This is a deposit in the relationship bank. 2. TURNING AWAY (ignoring): *continues scrolling phone* / no response. Most destructive because it's invisible. The bidder feels unseen. 3. TURNING AGAINST (hostile): "I'm busy." / "Who cares about a bird." Actively rejecting the connection attempt. THE RESEARCH: - Couples who stayed together turned toward bids 86% of the time. - Couples who divorced turned toward bids only 33% of the time. - This is a better predictor than how much you fight, how much sex you have, or how much you have in common. WHAT TO DO: For one week, notice your partner's bids. Every "hey look at this," every touch, every question. Respond to them. Put down your phone. Make eye contact. Engage for even 10 seconds. This single behavior change has more impact than any other. ``` ### Step 4: The Weekly Check-In **Agent action**: Provide the structured weekly conversation format. ``` THE 15-MINUTE WEEKLY CHECK-IN When: Same time each week. Sunday evening works for