soulforge
Run high-signal autonomous coding loops with Soulforge (feature-dev/bugfix/review-loop) using strict worktree isolation, review gates, and scoped fix cycles.
安装 / 下载方式
TotalClaw CLI推荐
totalclaw install clawskills:clawskills~jamesrp13-soulforgecURL直接下载,无需登录
curl -fsSL https://skills.taituai.com/api/skills/clawskills%3Aclawskills~jamesrp13-soulforge/file -o jamesrp13-soulforge.md# Soulforge (Effective Use Guide)
This is **not** a full engine reference. This is the operating playbook for getting high-quality autonomous coding outcomes with Soulforge.
## Core Operating Model
Use Soulforge when you want: plan → implement → verify/test → PR → review/fix loops with minimal babysitting.
Preferred workflows:
- `feature-dev` for end-to-end feature delivery
- `bugfix` for diagnose-first, surgical fixes
- `review-loop` for tightening an existing PR until clean
## Golden Rules (Most Important)
1. **Never run from repo main checkout.**
- Soulforge now enforces this guardrail.
2. **Always isolate work in worktrees.**
- Default base: `<repo>/worktrees/`
3. **Keep tasks tightly scoped.**
- Specific issue, explicit acceptance criteria, explicit DO-NOT list.
4. **Treat review findings with discipline.**
- FIX in-scope issues.
- Mark genuine extras as `SEPARATE`.
5. **Use callback-exec only.**
- HTTP callback mode is removed.
## Current Behavior You Should Rely On
### Workdir / Worktree safety
- If `--workdir` is omitted, Soulforge can auto-provision a worktree under `<repo>/worktrees/...`.
- Main checkout is blocked (including bare+worktree edge cases).
- Dirty worktrees are rejected for run start.
- Out-of-base workdirs are blocked unless explicitly overridden.
### Checkpoint model
- `approve/reject` is gone.
- Use structured completion via `soulforge complete ...`.
- Pause checkpoints are `type: pause`.
### Callback model
- Use `--callback-exec`.
- Template vars include:
- `{{run_id}}`, `{{step_id}}`, `{{step_status}}`, `{{status}}`, `{{task}}`
- `{{callback_message}}` (step-level, preferred)
- `{{prompt}}` remains for backward compatibility in pause scenarios
## Recommended Command Patterns
### Feature build
```bash
soulforge run feature-dev "Implement <issue-url>.
Constraints: max 2 stories. DO NOT refactor unrelated modules." \
--workdir /abs/path/to/repo/worktrees/feat-xyz \
--callback-exec 'openclaw agent --session-key "agent:cpto:slack:channel:c0af7b05h28" --message "Soulforge {{run_id}} {{step_id}} {{step_status}}" --deliver'
```
### Bugfix
```bash
soulforge run bugfix "Fix <issue-url> with failing test first; minimal patch only." \
--workdir /abs/path/to/repo/worktrees/fix-xyz \
--callback-exec 'openclaw agent --session-key "agent:cpto:slack:channel:c0af7b05h28" --message "Soulforge {{run_id}} {{step_id}} {{step_status}}" --deliver'
```
### Review-only tightening on an existing PR
```bash
soulforge run review-loop "Review PR #123 and fix only in-scope findings." \
--workdir /abs/path/to/repo/worktrees/pr-123 \
--var pr_number=123 \
--callback-exec 'openclaw agent --session-key "agent:cpto:slack:channel:c0af7b05h28" --message "Soulforge {{run_id}} {{step_id}} {{step_status}}" --deliver'
```
## How to Maximize Autonomous Quality
### 1) Give a tight task contract
Include:
- target issue/PR URL
- explicit in-scope list
- explicit out-of-scope list
- objective success criteria
### 2) Keep iteration loops short
If a PR loops repeatedly:
- create/update `.soulforge-progress.md` in worktree with exact outstanding fixes
- run `review-loop` constrained to remaining findings
### 3) Handle gates like an operator, not a coder
At review gate:
- move in-scope defects to FIX
- separate unrelated ideas into follow-up issues
- avoid “while we’re here” drift
### 4) Expect long fix steps; optimize signal
Long fix steps are normal for real refactors. Your job is quality control at gates, not interrupting active runs.
## Practical Triage Heuristic
When code-review returns findings:
- **High/Medium tied to original issue:** FIX now
- **Low tied to original issue correctness:** usually FIX now
- **Anything outside scope:** SEPARATE
## Anti-Patterns (Avoid)
- Running multiple workflows in the same checkout
- Allowing scope creep in repeated review-fix loops
- Merging with known Highs because “tests pass”
- Treating this skill as generic Soulforge docs instead of an execution playbook
## Minimal Status Workflow for Operator
- Start run
- Wait for review gate
- Triage with strict scope discipline
- Repeat until pass
- Merge
- Pull main + build + npm link + daemon restart (when local runtime should track latest)
## Notes
- If loops hit `max_loops`, spawn a fresh constrained `review-loop` run with a scope lock file.
- For long-running initiatives, keep a brief run ledger in the channel (run id → PR → status).